Orientation of stacking varies from person to person.

Structural Thinking: Create a hypothesis to reach the goal at the beginning.

/Art: I'm going to concentrate on the scarcity part and hope I can manage the rest at the end.

"We'll figure it out" looks poor from a structural thinking perspective.

https://gyazo.com/411f138cd97f414410fe8ac6d34a5de4

Negative capability = individual's propensity to be less anxious even when uncertainty remains

For managers and planners, the part that can be done if you do it is not worth discussing, I don't care how you do it,

The people who are in a position to do it have to discuss it, and if they don't discuss it, they assume that they will be badly hurt when they do it, so there is a misunderstanding.

---

So, when you talk about people like that in the mix.

"Now is not the time to discuss that, is it?"

"What's the point of discussing the implementation of that now?"

"If we have time to discuss its implementation, let us talk about the core of the plan."

I'm just going to be like that.

and as a result, implementers are sometimes removed from planning meetings

---

For example, when you are thinking about a plan based on a positioning strategy,

It's worth discussing what should differentiate us from other companies,

It doesn't make sense to argue about what makes us the same as other companies.

Worst-case scenario, since it's been determined that copying from another company will do the job, end the discussion with "worst-case scenario, copying is fine".

After all, I still feel that we should separate the structure of the problem from the solution. I feel that if management remains artistic, there will be problems for companies to scale.

[Understanding the Structure of the Problem

Positive evaluators think, "It's good that you have a solid plan, and if you follow the plan, you will be able to achieve your goals. Those who do not evaluate the plan think, "This is an empty theory based on a poor understanding of the problem at the moment, and a bad plan that does not take advantage of the knowledge gained during the project.

Those who perceive "artistic managers" as "placing the building blocks from the most important hollow parts without piling them from the bottom" are first of all comparing them to "building blocks," but this concept of "bottom" is at odds with each other. The "artistic manager" is also piling from the bottom, testing from the hypotheses that should be tested first and foremost.

When "I want to build a bridge across to the other side of the river," building C first and then A is "piling from below," but to someone who implicitly assumes the direction A to E in the image of crossing a bridge, it looks like "placing blocks in the hollow without piling from below and then filling the top and bottom.

https://gyazo.com/98a098cdd6e86aff50077fd65ad184e7

If there is no uncertainty in the project, it is enough to just do the work from the beginning. If there is uncertainty, the work done may be worthless if the project is executed based on assumptions and later turns out to be "different from what was envisioned. To reduce this probability, some people "start from the point of highest uncertainty.

This is not art, it is simply rational planning for uncertainty, but perhaps the expression "management is art" is used because you can't verbalize this well or you feel it's too much trouble to explain.

So, harajune's problem analysis is to verbalize this and do it consciously, as if he is saying, "Do you want to build a bridge here? Then you need three pillars.

"I don't like it when people talk about detailed design when we're doing conceptual design."

I was able to get it down in my mind like that.

It is a plan to create a structure that, if realized as planned, would result in the fulfillment of a matter, a blueprint in the architectural sense, and even if the blueprint is the same, there are many ways to plan the procedure.

Conceptual design and detailed design.

To someone who has only done detailed design and has no experience in conceptual design, conceptual design seems like an art that I don't understand.

---

"Conceptual design" is subject to intense constraints of marketing research, promotion, and market trends

If someone in a "detailed design" position, who only manufactures without looking at the market, looks at those "constraints", they look extremely irrational.

So I would describe it as "art" and put it outside of my understanding.

When there is uncertainty, the work performed may be worthless if it is performed based on assumptions and later becomes "different from what was expected". To reduce this probability, some people "start with the highest uncertainty.

---